Richard Sloan, a behavioral researcher at Columbia University, has it right when he says
I would like to see us stop wasting precious research dollars putting religious practices to the test of science. It's a waste of money, and it trivializes the religious experience.The story is, for a secular newspaper, fair and balanced. Can I write that about the Post? It's not Fox News, after all... Both "sides" if you will are represented: those who know that intercessory prayer works, and those skeptics who know it does not.
Both are right, in my opinion. First, let me clarify this seeming impossibility. I believe that prayer is necessary for us to lead full lives. I also know, with a certainty, that not all of our prayers can be answered, though all are heard. What a crazy world would we live in, were that all of our prayers were answered. Impossible, since Joe is praying for the exact opposite of what Sue is praying for. Fill in the names of your favorite people or groups. And remember that, as late as World War I, all of the major nations claimed that the (Christian) God was on their side, and, natch, they prayed for victory.
God knows. We don't. Prayer can help, especially if you believe in God, and know that someone is praying for you. Prayer can help, especially if you don't believe in God, and don't know that someone is praying for you.
God help those who think they know what God is doing. They are confused.
| technorati tag | Prayer|
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home