First source is a review of Michael Novak's "On Two Wings." This, as the Friends (Quakers) say, "speaks my mind":
The U.S. isn't officially Christian, but Novak demonstrates that the men who created it rooted the country conceptually in the Bible. The characterizations of God in the Declaration of Independence derive from the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament), probably deliberately, because all Christian denominations accepted them. Faith in God was ubiquitous among the founders, who regarded religion as necessary to maintain a just and equitable society. Only a moral (because religious) society would foster responsible citizens; pursuing freedom without religion, individuals would create a chaos of competing self-interests. Finally, the founders' conception of rights derived more from Acquinas than from Enlightenment philosophers. Quoting so often from the founders and their influences that this is practically a documentary history, Novak is compelling on those major propositions and others. He concludes by answering 10 common questions about religion and the founders, and he appends comments on some lesser-known important founders and the Revolution's great fellow traveler, Thomas Paine, who believed in God despite disapproving all the religions he knew. Hard but invaluably informative reading.The best background to this is to remember that at the time of our Revolution, memories of inter-sectarian Christian persecution were still raw. The founders, with very, very few exceptions, were at least nominal Christians, but clearly did not agree on which sect, if any, should be paramount. Hence the great need to allow all Christian sects but not establish any of them as the official American church. At the time, this was a radical break with precedent. A few years later, Jews and non-believers were also granted official tolerance in the various states.
Second is the thought that there is a bond between an allegedly atheistic (or, at the least, agnostic) Enlightenment philosophy and the "philosophy" of the Christian religion. From an article earlier this year in National Review by Christopher Levenick and Michael Novak:
Every single one of the Founders believed that, at the level of both individual morality and public policy, the demands of reason and of revelation powerfully reinforce one another. They understood that with respect to the ultimate questions — the creation of the universe, the purpose of human existence, and the hope of life after death — faith and philosophy might differ. In the practical world they inhabited, however, the Founders believed that both Socrates and Jesus enjoined their followers to accord all persons truth, justice, and charity.There is no doubt as to what "Religion" Mr. Washington spoke of -- a Christian faith.
Indeed, the Founders saw the cultivation of religious sentiment as the ultimate safeguard of American liberty. They knew that liberty could only prosper among moral citizens, whose practice of self-government in their private lives was a necessary prerequisite for its exercise in public. They believed that even if it were possible for certain individuals to behave morally without believing in God, on the whole an entire citizenry could not long keep its moral bearings without the guidance of religious faith.
This conviction permeates their public and private writings. George Washington placed it at the heart of his Farewell Address, in which he advised the nation that of "all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, Religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of Patriotism, who should labour to subvert these great Pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of Men & citizens." Indeed, he continued, "reason and experience both forbid us to expect that National morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle."
It is certainly possible to cherry-pick quotations from the various founders, and thereby use them to dispute things. George Washington was a nominal Episcopalian. John Adams became a Unitarian. Thomas Jefferson so disliked the idea of miracles that he personally edited them out of the Gospels. And so it goes, proving nothing. The proof is in stepping back from the dots that make up the pointillist canvas so one may see it whole.
The founders adhered to what I'd call a Christian worldview. One that did not allow for any single church to be established. One that tolerated all viewpoints. But one that bound our Constitution, our laws, and our national sense of what is honorable and right, as against what is vile and wrong, to the Scriptures.
Last point, just got to demonstrate our innate Baptist contrariness. Just because we were founded by Christians with a Christian worldview certainly does not mean we adhere to that. As an early Baptist, Roger Williams said, "If this were a Christian nation, then why are so few Americans Christians?"
| technorati tag | Christianity|
7 Comments:
If I may draw your attention to one such "Treaty of Peace and Friendship" signed by James Madison that states in Article 11:
"the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion"
I believe that "speaks my mind"
Sorry John Luke. But George Washington WAS NOT A FOUNDING FATHER!
If you cant get this basic fact straight, then you are in serious trouble.
Thomas Paine was a deist. So was Jefferson. So was Adams. So was Franklin. They were all founding fathers (unlike Washington) and they were all deists. That means that they didnt even believe in a God in the was Christianity defines it.
Do you even know what a deist really is? As far as your Xtian superstition is concerned, a deist might as well be an atheist.
The only thing you accomplished with this post is shown that America was NOT in ANY WAY founded of Christians, by Christians, or for Christians.
LOL I still cant get over the fact that you claimed Washington to be a founding father.
Hmm. Someone seems to think that George Washington wasn't one of the founders. Most interesting. May want to check out one of the men the historian Joseph Ellis lumped with TJ, Ben, and the rest...in his book, "Founding Brothers." Guess Mr. Ellis is also confused.
A majority of the Continentals of the revolutionary period were church members. Even as late as the 1920's, if you did not belong to a church or a lodge, you were deemed "strange". This is not all that relevant to the modern world, and it is not even something that one can make assumptions about. Many citizens had their tongues firmly in cheek as they went to church, as they do to this day. It's kind of akin to the Gays that are in the closet. Mark Twain commented about the people of his day that were only Christians on Sunday. You may contend that there were no atheists in foxholes, but I have read first-hand accounts of several wars that suggest that there was no lack of disbelief in "god's plan" either.
The foundation of the Declaration of Independence can be found in the writings of John Locke, not Jesus, the desciples, or Thomas Aquinas. To my way of thinking, there are many religious people that contributed to the advancement of modern society. The difference in our points of view can be expressed simply: I believe that they were laboring under a handicap.
Finally, the founders' conception of rights derived more from Acquinas than from Enlightenment philosophers.
Well, Aquinas got more from Aristotle then he did from the Bible, if you ask me...
Anyways, this whole "the government is founded on the Bible" argument is just nonsense. Where, anywhere, in the Bible are the ideas that form the basis of the modern democratic state? Nowhere. The ideas stem more from Locke, Montiesque, Hume, classical writers, etc. than any religious source.
What was distinctive to Aquinas from people like Augustine came mostly from Aristotle. Aquinas had far more in common with Augustine than he did with Aristotle, in the final analysis. Except for some technical points in complex philosophical issues, they both stand against people like Plato and Aristotle on most issues people nowadays would care about.
I think both sides of this debate are wrong. Those who want all the founding fathers to have been Christian are just wrong. Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, and Adams were clearly not Christians as I understand Christianity. Those who say the opposite, that most of the founding fathers weren't Christians, are just as historically inaccurate. Most of the signers of the Constitution were, as I understand it, what we now call evangelical Christians. It's just that the most influential people involved in the process weren't.
Jefferson was clearly theistic, however. He was not a deist in the sense that Antony Flew now is. He didn't believe in miracles, but that's because he believed God was behind everything that takes place naturally and could work just as well by using the laws of nature. He did believe God was the basis of ethics, and he did believe God was the basis of rights. He got this directly from John Locke, who I don't consider a genuine Christian. Locke denied the divinity of Christ. Locke certainly did believe in a God active in the universe, however, and I think Jefferson did too. It just wasn't one who believed in what Christians believe about miracles.
Post a Comment
<< Home